Home

Agenda/Minutes 

Planning/Zoning

Assessing

Bulletin Board

Business Directory

Cemeteries

Clerk's Corner

Community Events

Contact Information

DPW

Development Documents

FAQ

Financial information

Heritage Days

Links  

Meeting Calendar

Newsletters

Officials

Parks

Plats

Planning/Zoning

PropertyTax/Assessing Data

Township Agreements

Rental Policy

Treasurer's Report

 

 

MARION TOWNSHIP

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

Monday, November 7, 2005

7:30 p.m.

 AGENDA  

CALL TO ORDER:

MEMBERS PRESENT: 

CALL TO PUBLIC:  Agenda Items only – 3 minute limit

APPROVAL OF AGENDA:   November 7, 2005

APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR: 

                   September 26, 2005 Joint Meeting

                  October 3, 2005 Regular Minutes

OLD BUSINESS:   NONE               

NEW BUSINESS:  ZBA Case # 10-05 – James & Tracey Hare

CALL TO PUBLIC:

ADJOURNMENT:                                        

                                    DRAFT MINUTES 

MEMBERS PRESENT:    John Lowe, Dan Lowe, Linda Manson-Dempsey, Larry Fillinger

                                     and Dan Rossbach

MEMBERS ABSENT:      None

OTHERS PRESENT:       Annette McNamara , Zoning Administrator                                                                 

**********************************************************************************************

CALL TO ORDER

John Lowe called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m.  

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

Linda Manson-Dempsey motioned to approve the agenda as presented.  Larry Fillinger 

seconded.  Motion carried 5-0.

MEMBERS PRESENT

The members of the Zoning Board of Appeals introduced themselves. 

CALL TO THE PUBLIC

None.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

September 26, 2005 Joint Meeting:  Larry Fillinger motioned to approve the minutes as 

presented.  Dan Rossbach seconded.  Motion carried 5-0.

October 3, 2005 Regular Meeting:  Larry Fillinger motioned to approve the minutes as 

presented.  Linda Manson-Dempsey seconded.  Motion carried 5-0.

NEW BUSINESS
ZBA Case #10-05—James & Tracey Hare

Mr. Hare said he is requesting the variance due to the location of the septic field.  The 

Livingston County Health Department (LCHD) has denied moving it. 

Jack Lowe said he went to the LCHD and talked with the specialist on engineered drain fields 

and was told they require a larger buffer.  The plan presented to the ZBA is the only plan the 

LCHD will accept because of the ground conditions.  Jack Lowe said he discussed the options 

with the LCHD, and they feel this is the only solution.  There are several houses in the area 

similarly located. Mr. Lowe said the lot was created in 1994, which was prior to the 1996 

ordinance requiring a 100-foot setback on the D-19 corridor.  Linda Manson-Dempsey asked if 

the lot was changed in 2002.  Mr. Lowe said that was a boundary line change.  Annette 

McNamara said the lot was increased to two acres to accommodate the septic system.  Mr. 

Lowe said he talked with the attorney on this issue, and because of the LCHD’s restrictions, if 

they can’t have the setback changed, the lot becomes unusable. 

Ms. Manson-Dempsey said the applicant purchased the property in May 2005 

and was under the impression that the septic field was installed and on file with the LCHD.  

Mr. Hare said yes, he was told the field was installed.  After he bought the property, he found 

out there were no permits pulled for the septic field.  Mr. Hare said his paperwork says it’s 

partially installed.  Mr. Lowe said the LCHD would accept the installation of the field with two 

additional lines.  Ms. Manson-Dempsey asked if a permit is required to start installation. 

Mr. Hare said it’s not on file. 

Larry Fillinger asked for setback measurements on other houses in the vicinity.  Annette 

McNamara said the house to the north is approximately 90 feet, and the house to the south is 

approximately 78 feet.  Mr. Fillinger said his concern is issuing front yard variances on D-19 

and what the impact will be if D-19 is ever widened.  Jack Lowe said four lanes would fit within 

the 66-foot easement. 

The Hare’s builder said it’s been prepped for a sand filtration system, which has the same 

trenches used in the Advantix system.  The plan that the ZBA has is set for sand filtration.  

Theoretically, everything’s the same except the tanks are switched.  The trench lines on the 

plan are already installed.  The only place the LCHD will approve the trenches is where they 

are.  Linda Manson-Dempsey asked when they were installed.  The builder said he believes 

they were installed in 2002.  Boss Engineering has assured them that they would certify all 

the trenches that are there because they oversaw the installation.  The builder said the 

previous owner was supposed to get a permit and he started the process; however, he didn’t 

pay the $180 to finalize everything. 

Motion

Dan Lowe motioned, for ZBA Case #10-05—James and Tracey Hare, Tax Code 

#4710-26-200-051, to relax Section 8.01 F 3 a—Yard and Setback Requirements of the zoning 

ordinance, to allow a 30-foot front yard variance for construction of a new house, considering 

the following criteria:

  1. How the strict enforcement of the provisions of the township’s zoning ordinance would cause an unnecessary hardship and deprive the owner of rights enjoyed by all other property owners owning property within the same zoning district.

  The strict enforcement of the ordinance would make the lot unbuildable due to the Livingston County Health Department’s requirements. 

  1. The conditions and circumstances unique to the property, which are not similarly applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. 

 The conditions are unique to the property because of the soils that are there and the wetlands.  It’s the only location for the drain field.

  1. The conditions and circumstances unique to the property were not self-created.  

    The lot was enlarged in 2002 to accommodate the new drain field system, which also made the lot more conforming.

  1. Why the requested variance would not confer special privileges that are denied other properties similarly situated in the same zoning district. 

The setbacks to the south are less than the required 100 feet, and the lot to the north is only 90 feet. 

  5.    Why the requested variance would not be contrary to the spirit and intent of this zoning    ordinance. 

This lot was created in 1994 and the setback at that time was 70 feet.

  1. The difficulties shall not be deemed solely economic. 

 Without the setback variance, the lot is unbuildable and the property unusable and   would be a taking of the land.

Discussion:  Linda Manson-Dempsey asked if it should be referenced as an existing lot prior 

to the ordinance if it was changed in 2002.  Annette McNamara said when issuing a land use 

permit, they don’t have 150 feet of frontage, which is the requirement for the rural residential 

district.  She would overlook that because the township created the lot, and she would look at 

it as the lot of record. 

Larry Fillinger asked to have the following included as part of the motion:  “subject to all 

permits being pulled and existing and future work being certified by an acceptable engineering 

firm.”  Larry Fillinger seconded.  Roll call vote:  Dan Rossbach—yes, Larry Fillinger—yes, 

Linda Manson-Dempsey—no, John Lowe—yes, Dan Lowe—yes.  Motion carried 4-1.

CALL TO THE PUBLIC

Larry Fillinger asked if the Radicks’ dogs have been debarked.  Annette McNamara said 

the Radicks have not been responsive to her phone calls.  She will take the township 

supervisor with her on a site visit.  If the Radick’s won’t provide the zoning administrator 

with the requested information, she will send a letter asking them to come to the next ZBA 

meeting.

ADJOURNMENT

Linda Manson-Dempsey motioned to adjourn the meeting at 8:05 p.m.   Larry Fillinger 

seconded.  Motion carried 5-0.

 

 

 

 

 

Hit Counter