|
|||
|
Draft MARION TOWNSHIP
PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING—AT&T COMMUNICATION TOWER
MEMBERS PRESENT: John Lowe, David Hamann, Jean Root, Jim Anderson and Debra Wiedman-Clawson MEMBERS
ABSENT:
None OTHERS
PRESENT:
Annette McNamara, Zoning Administrator
John
Ambrose, Township Planner ******************************************************************************************** CALL TO ORDER
John Lowe called the Public Hearing to order at 7:15 p.m. Dave Hamann motioned to approve the agenda. Jean Root seconded. Motion
carried 5-0. OLD BUSINESS
AT&T Communication Tower Michael Sivore from AT&T Wireless presented the revised site plan and conceptual plan for the communication tower. The proposal includes a 95 foot monopole structure. The tower will accommodate an additional five carriers. The tower will be within an 80 x 80 fenced compound. Access road located behind township hall. Numerous meetings, finalized, clarified grading on this site plan. The main intention is to provide coverage for the township. John Ambrose wanted to clarify the purpose of the public hearing is based on the criteria found in Section 16.05 of the zoning ordinance which are the general standards for which special use is approved. There are 11 criteria. Mr. Ambrose feels the proposed project meets the criteria and feels recommendation would be appropriate. The landscape plan indicates white pines and Mr. Ambrose feels that’s not a satisfactory screening material. Norway spruce or white spruce would be a much better tree to use because they
maintain foliage from the ground up over time.
Tom Baron, Fowlerville: Mr. Baron owns six acres 300 feet from the base of the tower and that’s his concern. He’s not worriedabout the radiation. He
wants to eventually sell the property and he’s concerned about the value
of his land.
cell towers have unfortunately been lumped together with radio and television towers. The typical emission from a cell tower 195’off the ground is less than 100 watts of power, which is less than a microwave oven. By the time 100 watts dissipates, it’s less thanzero.
The FCC, along with OSHA, provides certain regulatory restrictions.
Mr. Baron said Bentley Lake
Road. There’s only one
building site, approximately 600 feet away.
Most of the property is swampy.
Mr. Sivore asked if Mr. Baron
had found any information that supports the theory that property values
decrease? Mr. Baron had not.
Dave Hamann pointed out that the
township is considering putting in a park, and that might affect his
property value.
Mr. Baron feels that whether or not there are risks associated with cell towers, people still believe there are, and it certainly doesn’tenhance his property.
money as property that wasn’t
under the lines.
Tom Klebba, 1615 Triangle Lake Road:
Mr. Klebba suggested that Mr. Baron have a market analysis done now.
John Lowe said that 600 feet is quite a distance and should have no negative effect. The location the township picked gives the most coverage and impacts fewer people. has. Mr. Baron said approximately ½ acre; the remainder is wet. Ms. Wiedman-Clawson also felt a market analysis would be a good idea.
ADJOURNMENT
Dave Hamann motioned to adjourn at 7:40 p.m.
Jim Anderson seconded. Motion
carried 5-0.
MARION TOWNSHIPPLANNING COMMISSIONREGULAR MEETING MEMBERS
PRESENT:
John Lowe, David Hamann, Jean
Root, Jim
Anderson,
&
Debra Wiedman-Clawson MEMBERS
ABSENT:
None OTHER
PRESENT:
Annette McNamara, Zoning
Administrator
John Ambrose, Township Planner
Sue Lingle, Township
Treasurer
Bob Hanvey, Township Supervisor
Tom Klebba, Township
Consultant ******************************************************************************************** CALL TO ORDERJohn
Lowe called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Dave
Hamann motioned to approve agenda. Debra
Wiedman-Clawson seconded. Motion
carried 5-0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
February
25, 2003 Regular Meeting Jean
Root motioned to approve minutes as amended.
Jim Anderson seconded. Motion
carried 5-0. March
4, 2003 Ordinance Workshop Jean
Root motioned to approve minutes as amended.
Jim Anderson seconded. Motion
carried 5-0. OLD BUSINESSAT&T Communication Tower—Final Review
Michael Sivore presented a revised grading plan that includes grading for the road as well as the tower compound. Also included is soil erosion detail in response to Tetra Tech’s review letter. Debra Wiedman-Clawson asked if there was underground wire or cable running to the tower. Mr. Sivore indicated power comes in from electric pole. If necessary, another transformer could be added. John Lowe pointed out that drawing Z-3 shows proposed underground power. Mr. Lowe asked if the original site plan was revised to address drainage issues within the fenced area. Mr. Sivore said the architect changed the elevations to accommodate the 1% slope. Mr. Lowe indicated the township needs to have the drawings that reflect the change. Mr. Sivore indicated the drawings were just forwarded to Tetra Tech. The smaller fenced section is 967 and the area around the fence is the same elevation. Without some kind of pitch, the water will just sit there. Basically, the contours on the east side need to be readjusted. Mr. Lowe asked Tom Klebba if the elevations meet the requirements for the driveway. Mr. Klebba said yes. Mr. Lowe indicated the grade changes should be dropped about ½ foot; move the contours back on the hill and put a 966 swale on
the outside of the fence and change elevation on corner to 966.5.
Three items: driveway elevations, grade changes and change trees from white pine to Norway. Work out with zoning administrator
if finding Norway is a problem. Mr. Sivore said typically the gravel is pulled back and ground wiring is installed. The gravel and geotextile is replaced. Mr. Lowe asked about the type of gravel that will be used. The plans indicate 22A. Mr. Lowe would like to ask that limestone be used (21AA crushed). Mr. Lowe asked if AT&T would maintain the area. Mr. Sivore said not if it’s used for township traffic. The compound will be gated. If AT&T and co-locators are the only ones using
the driveway,
AT&T will install gate at parking lot.
Call to the Public:
None.
Motion
Jean Root motioned to recommend approval for Special Use Permit for AT&T Wireless Services, Parcel #4710-22-300-019, pursuant to Section 16.05, Basis for Determination, items 1-11 have been satisfied, subject to an approved site plan. Jim Anderson seconded. Roll call vote: Jim Anderson, Jean Root, John Lowe, Dave
Hamann, Debra Wiedman-Clawson–all yes.
Motion
carried 5-0,
to be forwarded to Township Board. Jean Root motioned to approve the site plan for AT&T Wireless, Parcel #4710-22-300-019, dated 3/14/03, with
the following conditions:
Dave Hamann seconded. Roll call vote: Debra Wiedman-Clawson, Dave Hamann, John Lowe, Jean
Root, Jim Anderson—all yes. Motion
carried 5-0. Marion
Township Hall Addition—Final Review Tom
Klebba was present to address the following issues from the preliminary
review.
Call to the Public: None. Motion
Jean Root motioned to approval final site plan for the Marion Township Hall addition and renovation, Parcel #4710-22-300-019, on site plan dated 3/17/03. Jim Anderson seconded. Roll call vote: Debra
Wiedman-Clawson, Dave Hamann, John Lowe, Jean Root, Jim Anderson—all yes.
Motion
carried 5-0. Mr. Lowe asked if any service groups were available to plant trees, etc., such as the Boy Scouts, 4-H, Junior Master
Gardener, Girl Scouts. Mr. Lowe
offered to donate mulch. Proposed
Ordinance Amendments Section 5.05 C—Variances The
copy presented at this meeting includes new item 6. Jean Root motioned to send Section 5.05 C—Variances, as submitted to John Ambrose, to township board for its approval. Debra Wiedman-Clawson seconded. Roll call vote: Jim Anderson, Jean Root, John Lowe, Dave Hamann and Debra Wiedman-Clawson - all yes. Motion Carried 5-0. Section
17.10—Communication Towers Jean Root motioned to table this item until the next regularly scheduled meeting. Jim Anderson seconded. Motion carried 5-0. Section 6.14—Home
Occupation John Ambrose was requested to provide information regarding home occupations, livestock standards and civil infractions. Many communities use a similar ordinance. Home occupations can be problematic. The main difference in this document is that home occupations are classified in three areas: Class I—no impact, no Planning Commission approval; Class II—minimal impact, requires Planning Commission approval, applies to all districts; Class III—more impact, allows use of accessory structure, requires public hearing (same as Special Use Permit), requires Planning Commission approval. Conditions can be created in approval. Class III is for the life the applicant, not the property. Fees can be set for Class III. Discussion was held regarding classifications. Bob Hanvey asked why approval would be required for a Class I? Mr. Ambrose said some communities allow a certain percentage of the home area to the used. Mr. Hanvey feels that isn’t something the township can verify. Mr. Ambrose feels that most people will come to the township if the ordinance requires. Mr. Hanvey also asked if zoning ordinances are retroactive? Mr. Ambrose said absolutely not. Mr. Lowe would like verbiage (similar to 2 b 1 in Class II) added to Class III to state that activity needs to remain inside accessory structure. Mr. Lowe also said that some of the “home occupations” exceed the limits established in the Class III definition. Sue Lingle asked if reference is made to number of employees. Mr. Ambrose said the restriction of employees applies to all classes. Mr. Ambrose feels that if a business has employees, the business belongs in an industrial or commercial district, not residential. Ms. Root suggested regulating items such as chemical storage, hours of operation, storage areas, noise, etc., instead of regulating the business itself. Mr. Ambrose said the problem with that approach is that if the township doesn’t enforce in all cases, the worst offenders can’t be taken to court. Most of the complaints the township receives are about outside storage of equipment or excessive traffic. NEW
BUSINESS Review of Site Plan ChecklistDebra Wiedman-Clawson gave a brief description of the site plan checklists from various townships and asked committee members to
review and comment at the next meeting.
CALL
TO THE PUBLIC None. ADJOURNMENT Dave Hamann motioned to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m. Jean Root seconded. Motion carried 5-0.
|